Document Type : مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

Authors

1 PhD Student in Political Geography, Southwest Asia Studies, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Geopolitics,, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Political Geography, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Saveh, Iran.

Abstract

Diplomacy is the most important aspects and the most objective forms of a country's foreign policy. This research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive, analytical and exploratory in terms of research method. This study uses ARC GIS software to implement the leveling of national power in the target countries (in the GIS environment). It also uses the AHP model to weight the sub-components of public diplomacy. Also, in this study Moran's test has been used to spatially analyze the pattern of distribution of national power indicators, and also the Meta-SWOT method has been used to provide a stable spatial pattern, and 36 sub-components (indices) has been used for the spatial analysis and stratification of Southwest Asian countries based on the public diplomacy component. The findings shows the fact that the countries of Syria and Armenia have played a significant role in increasing the geopolitical weight of Iran and are  very important, as well as the countries of Iraq and Georgia are in a position of high importance, and the countries of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Qatar are in a position of medium importance. The UAE, Kuwait, Jordan and Cyprus are in a low-important position. According to the analysis, the results show the fact that the component of public diplomacy follows a cluster pattern. The similar political behavior of the Persian Gulf countries in relation to Iran is one of the geopolitical reasons for this cluster distribution.   By strengthening this axis (public diplomacy) the countries of Lebanon, Azerbaijan, Iraq, Turkey and Qatar can also be added to the list of very important countries and by forming a very strong cluster consisting of the mentioned countries can help to increase the role of the political power of Iran in the region.  According to conducted research, the application of economic sanctions has been identified as the biggest challenges and obstacles to the application of regional policies of Iran. Placement in the security environment of Southwest Asia region and the sanctions on Iran's monetary and banking system are considered as the biggest environmental, economic and legal obstacles that require attention due to the size and the degree of influence of each.

Keywords

  1. Ahadi, A., (2009). Iran's nuclear program from the perspective of public diplomacy. Rahbord Quarterly, 18(51), 249-270. [In Persian]
  2. Ashna, H., & Jafari Haft Khwani, N., (2007). Public diplomacy and foreign policy; Links and goals. Two quarterly journals of political knowledge, No. 5,179-205. [In Persian].
  3. Azami, H., (2006). Geopolitical weight and regional power system (case study: Southwest Asia). Geopolitics Quarterly, 2(5), 149-193. [In Persian].
  4. Bakhtiari, E., (2011). Examining the similarities and differences of public diplomacy with soft concepts. Psychological Operations Quarterly, 8(30), 214-236. [In Persian].
  5. Bayne, N., & Woolcock, S., (2010). The new economic diplomacy: decision-making and negotiation in international economic relations. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing LTD.  
  6. Biki, M., (2010). The soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran (a case study of Lebanon). Iran, Tehran: Imam Sadiq University and the Secretariat of the Psychological Operations Conference. [In Persian].
  7. Fathi, Y., & Pakdaman, R., (2010). The position of Iran's partners in commercial diplomacy. Foreign relations, 2(3), 251-201. [In Persian].
  8. Hafeznia, M.R., Zarghani, S.H., Ahmadipour, Z., & Eftekhari, A.R., (2005). Designing a Model for Measuring the National Power of Countries. Geopolitics Quarterly, 2(4), 46-73. [In Persian].
  9. Heydari, Gh.H., & Heydari Bani, Z., (2018). Examining the challenges of national power in Iran. Geopolitics Quarterly, 10(1), 60-82. [In Persian].
  10. Kadera, M.K., (2018). Measuring National Power, International Interactions. England , London: Taylor &Francis.  
  11. Mousavi Shafaee S.M., & Imani H., (2007). Economic diplomacy, an approach to increase Iran's national power. Rahbord Quarterly, 26(84), 149-174. [In Persian].
  12. Muir,R., (2019). Modern Political Geography. London and Hong Kong: Mac Millan Education
  13. Nye, J.S., (2019). The Future of Power. US, New York: Public Affairs.
  14. Pishgahi Fard, Z., Hosseini, S.M., & Farahani, M., (2014). Ranking of the national power of the Middle East countries by using compensatory multi-criteria decision-making. Police Geography Research Journal, 2(5), 1-44. [In Persian].
  15. Pourahmadi, H., (2010). Soft Power and Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran, Qom: Bostan Kitab Publications. [In Persian].
  16. Pourhasan, N., (2011). New Public Diplomacy and Comprehensive Defense. Defense Rahbord Quarterly, 9(33), 137-158. [In Persian].
  17. Rana, K.S., (2007). Economic diplomacy: the experience of developing countries. The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-Making and Negotiations in International Economic Relations. Aldershot: Ashgate.  
  18. Seyf Zade, S.H., (2007). Principles of international relations. Iran, Tehran: Mizan publishing. [In Persian].
  19. Skilas, P., Roukanas, S., & Pistikou, V., (2012). China’s Economic Diplomacy: A Comparative Approach to Sino-Greek and SinoTurkish relations. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(10), 288.
  20. Taheri Mousavi, M., (2008). Geography and National Strategy of Iran. Iran,Tehran: Geographical Organization of the Armed Forces. [In Persian].
  21. Vasegh, M., & Sekke Ravani, D., (2017). The influence of spatial minorities on national power. Human geography researches, 3(49), 675-691. [In Persian].
CAPTCHA Image