Investigating the ways of Fragility of states in the Central Asia: Based on ‘’fuzzy logic’’ method

Document Type : مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

Authors

• Aboalghasem Shahryari ¹
• Sara Akbari ¹
• Mohadeseh Jazaei ²

¹ PhD Student of Political Science, & visiting professor of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Mashhad. Iran

² PhD Student of Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Mashhad. Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.2023.27206.0

Abstract

The concept of the fragility of the state is one of the key words in the political sciences that were considered in the post-World War II period, and especially after the end of the Cold War. The Central Asia has also been one of the geographic regions that has sparked many views and analyzes on the states in the region and their fragility. But it should be noted that the paths that lead to the fragility of governments are not the same, and it is possible to draw different patterns from the ways leading to the fragility of the state. According to this the main research question are, what is the state of fragility in the Central Asia? What are the characteristics of paths that lead to the fragility of the Central Asiaern states? Considering the exploratory nature of the main research question, no hypotheses have been presented and interpreted for the results. To answer the questions, with the benefit of fuzzy logic, the top paths that are created by the combination of several factors are examined. The survey also shows that 10 governments in the Central Asia are fragile states and can identify four causal paths among them. Also, among the factors involved in these causal paths, the government's lack of legitimacy and the existence of conflicting groups can be identified as an unnecessary imperative for the fragile states of the Central Asia.

Keywords

• Central Asia
• government fragility
• fuzzy logic

References

1. Ahmadian Shalchi, N., (1999). Familiar Land Geographical Characteristics of Asian Countries. Iran, Mashhad: Astan Quds, [In Persian].
2. Alley, A.L., (2010). Yemen's Multiple Crises. Journal of Democracy, 2(4),72-86.
3. Azami, H., & Dabiri, A.A., (2013). Assessing Iran's Geopolitical Opportunities and Challenges in Central Asia. Geographical space, 12(40), 25-47 [In Persian].
4. Collier, P., (2003). Breaking the Conflict Trap. World Bank Policy Research Report, Washington Oxford University Press.

5. Cowan, P.J., (2006). Geographic usage of the terms Middle Asia and central Asia. journal of the Arid Environments, 23(69), 359-363.

1. Fatemi Nejad, A., & Hashemi, M.R., (2017). Regionalism of Iran and Central Asia in the light of globalization: A plan for the regional international community. Strategic studies of public policy, 6(21), 123-144 [In Persian].
2. Fragil States Index (2017). Found for Peac (FFP), Foundforpeac.org/ library/-fragilstatesindex-2015.pdf
3. Kolaei, E., & Akbari, Z., (2016). Fragile Government in Iraq and Women's Security. Politics, 47(1),177-159[In Persian].
4. Lacroix, S., (2014). Saudi Islamists and the Arab Spring. the London School of Economics and Political Science.
5. Lewis, B., (2001). The Multiple Identities of the Middle East Shocked. NewYork: Praeger.
6. Lewis, B., (2002). What Went Wrong? Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response. Oxford University press.
7. Merzlyakova, I., (2002). The Mountains of Central Asia and Kazakhstan. In: Shahgedanova, M. (Ed.), The Physical Geography of Northern Eurasia. (pp: 377–402) Oxford, Oxford University Press.
8. Saei, A., & Kabiri, A., (2012). Comparative Analysis of Governance Quality: An Inter-Country Study with a Fuzzy Approach from 2008-2000. Social Sciences, No. 58: 108-59[In Persian].
9. Saei, A., Kabiri, A., Kasraei, M.S., & Sadeghi, H., (2011). Social Capital and Good Governance: Fuzzy Comparative Analysis between the Country from 2000 to 2008. Social Issues in Iran, No. 10: 94-63[In Persian].
10. Selvik, K., & Stig S., (2011). Stability and Change in the Modern Middle-
    East. I.B. Tauris.
11. Simbar, R., & Rezapour, D., (2019). Analysis of Russia's geopolitical policies towards Central Asia with emphasis on the Chinese factor. Politics and International Relations, No. 6: 137- 165 [In Persian].
12. Tibi, B., (1990). the simultaneity of the unsimultaneous: old tribes and imposed- nation-states in the modern middle east.in: Khoury, Philip. Joseph Kostiner (eds) Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East. University of California Press.
13. -UNDP, HDR, (2000). Human Rights and Human Development. vailable at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2000.
14. Yazdan Fam, M., (2009). Fragile Governments and Human Security. Strategic Studies, No.46: 5-36 [In Persian].