Conformity Ratio of Hydropolitical Approaches and Governing Principles of International Rivers

Document Type : مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

Authors

• Ahmad Rashidi nejad ¹
• Morad Kaviani Rad ²
• Afshin mottaghi ²

¹ Ph.D. in Political Geography, Khwarazmi University, Tehran, Iran

² Associate Professor, Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Khwarazmi University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.2022.72088.1084

Abstract

The legal regime of common water resources remains the main concern of countries in the international river basin. In this regard, it seems difficult and unresolved just as before to determine the legal regime of these rivers, due to the different viewpoints of the coastal countries located in the basin of these rivers, on the extent and how to exploit these resources. In general, the approach of governments in the exploitation of these resources stems from two perspectives: a perspective accepts the problem of water scarcity and, with proper management, considers water as an important factor in regional cooperation. In contrast, the other one, given the certainty of conflict over natural resources, regards the conflict and crisis over common water resources as inevitable. Accordingly, the present article examines the governing principles of water resources exploitation of international rivers, assuming that the geographical location (upstream-downstream relations) and hydro-hegemonic position of coastal countries is effective in adopting the governing principles of international rivers. It has also dealt with the conformity ratio of these principles with the approaches and hydro-political attitudes of the countries in the basin of these rivers. The data and information required for the article have been collected through library method (books, publications and Internet). It seems that the adoption or development of governing principles of international rivers exploitation can be derived from the upstream-downstream position and the hydro-hegemonic status of the countries located at the basin of a river. While confirming the hypothesis and the effectiveness of hydropolitical approaches, the article has come to the conclusion that the principles with cooperation-oriented approaches of downstream countries or with low geopolitical weight and the principles with conflict-oriented approaches of upstream countries or with high geopolitical weight have received more attention and acceptance.

Keywords

• International Rivers
• Legal regime
• Hydro-politics
• Hydro-hegemony
• Geopolitical weight

References

1. Al-Ansari, N., Nasrat, A., Sven, K., & Jan, L., (2018). Geopolitics of the Tigris and Euphrates Basins. Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, 8(3),187-222.
2. Adeel, Z., Sirodjidin, A., Josefina, M., & Olcay, U., (2015). Water cooperatio: Views on Progress and the Way Forward. Canada, Ontario: United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH. researchgate.net/ publication/ 284030462.
3. Avarideh, F., Attari, J., & Abdullahi, M., (2016). Comparative Study of the International Law related to Water Sharing in Trans-boundary Rivers. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 14(2), 79-96 [In Persian]
4. Akbari, N., Mashhadi, A., & kazemi, H., (2020). The Legal Aspects of Helmand River Utilization. Public Law Research 22(68), 291-324. Doi: 10.22054/QJPL.2019.37210.1987. [In Persian]
5. Cooley, H., & Gleick, P., (2011). Climate-proofing transboundary water agreements. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 56(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.576651
6. Campbell, I., & Barlow, C., (2018). Knowledge transfer in international water resources management - six challenges. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. researchgate.net/publication/325869135
7. Cascão, A., Nicol, A., (2016). GERD: new norms of cooperation in the Nile Basin? Water International, 41(4), 550-573. ISSN: 0250-8060. DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2016.1180763. 558
8. Di Nunzio, J., (2013). Conflict on the Nile: The future of transboundary water disputes over the world’s longest river. Strategic Analysis Paper, Future Directions International.
9. De Queiroz, A., & Tiburcio, J.F., (2018). The Effectiveness of governance Mechanisms in Scenarios of Water Scarcity: The Cases of the Hydropolitical Complexes of Southern Africa and Jordan River Basin.Economics, Law and Policy,1(1), 1-29.
10. Grech-Madin, C., Stefan, D., Kyungmee, K., & Ashok, S., (2018). Negotiating water across levels: A peace and conflict ‘‘Toolbox” for water diplomacy. Journal of Hydrology, 559: 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.008.
11. Joyeeta, G., (2016). The Watercourses Convention, Hydro-hegemony and Transboundary Water Issues.The International Spectator Italian Journal of International Affairs. 51(3), 118- 131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2016.1198558.
12. Klimes, M., David, M., Elizabeth, Y., & Phillia, R., (2019). Water diplomacy: the intersect of science, policy and practice. Journal of Hydrology. 575(3), 1362-1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.049.
13. Kaviani rad, M., (2019). Hydropolitics: Straits and Approaches. Iran, Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies Publications.
14. Kaviani rad, M., Mottaqid Dastnaei, A., Mokhtari, H., & RashidiNejad, A., (2019). Effect of Hydropolitics Relations on international conflicts: A Case Study of Golan Heights. Palestinian Strategic Discourse Quarterly. 1(2), 67-93. [In Persian]
15. Khaledi, H., Mirzaei, M.A., Pirdashti, H., SamadzadehGolestan, H., (2014). Investigating the role of border rivers in Iran-Iraq relations (Case study: Arvandrud. Border Science and Technology. 5(3), 53-82. [In Persian]
16. McCracken, M., & Wolf, A., (2019). Updating the register of international river basins of the world. International Journal of Water Resources Development, No.1, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1572497
17. Martina, F., Christof, S., Robert, I.M., (2019). Water competition between cities and agriculture driven by climate change and urban growth. Nature Sustainability. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-017-0006-8.
18. Moradi Tadi, M., (2017). Water and Politics; A look at the process of water politicization. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities. 9(4), 71-90.[In Persian]
19. Mohseni, B., & Rahimipour, M., (2012). The Hydropolitical Impact of the Arvand River on the Future Relations between Iran and Iraq. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Policy Research. 1(3), 157-183. [In Persian]
20. Mohammad Alipour, F., Amani, M., (2017). Investigating the Effects of Sovereignty on Border and Common Rivers: A Case Study: Central Asia 2014-1991. Quarterly Journal of Politics. 4(16), 19-35.[In Persian]
21. Mashhadi, A., Akbari, N., (2020).The International Obligation of Harirud Riparian States in Marine Construction. International Law Review, 37(63), 309-342. Doi: 10.22066/ 2020.96365.1600. [In Persian]
22. Moosazadeh R., & Abbaszadeh, M., (2016). Legal Aspects of Exploitation of Hirmand Border River by Iran and Afghanistan. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 22(93),159-183. [In Persian]
23. Mianabadi, H., (2013). Political, Security and Legal Considerations in Trans-boundary River Management. International Relations Research.  3(9), 203. [In Persian]
24. Nami, M.H., & Mohammadpour, A., (2011). Political geography of Iran's border waters (rivers). Iran, Tehran: Green Olive. [In Persian]
25. Parsa, B.,(2013). A Comparative Study of the Water Diplomacy on Iran's Relation with Western and Eastern Naighboring Countries (Hydro politics of Border Rivers). Iran, Tehran: (M.Sc. Thesis in Political Science), Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch. [In Persian]
26. RashidiNejad, A., (2019). Reflection of Hydropolitical Actions of Upstream Tigris and Euphrates Countries on Islamic Republic of Iran's Security: Case study Gap Project in Turkey. (PhD Thesis in Political Geography), Assistant Professor Morad Kaviani-Rad. Kharazmi University. [In Persian]
27. Rashidinejad, A., kaviani rad, M., Motaghi, A., (2021). Effect of Hydropolitics Relations on the Nation-Building Process, Case Study: Rogun Dam Superstructure in Tajikistan. Water and Sustainable Development. 7(4),11-20. Doi: 10.22067/JWSD.V7I4.86939. [In Persian]
28. Shouli, A., Watanfada, J., Avrideh, F., (2015). Review of legal theories and regulations of water division in international laws and treaties of border waters. Quarterly Journal of Marz Faculty of Science and Technology, 6(2), 121-152. [In Persian]
29. Salehabadi, R., (2015). Investigation of hydropolitical challenges of water resources in the geopolitical region of Central Asia. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 28(2), 347-381. [In Persian]
30. Tohidi, A.R., & Keykhosravi, M., (2019). The Absence of Treaties: The Need for Investigating States’ International Obligations in the Dam Construction Process from the Perspective of International Law. International Law Review. 36(61),385-412. [In Persian] Doi: 10.22066/CILAMAG.2019.83734.1477.
31. Voladani, G., (2009). Utilization of water resources of Iran-Iraq border rivers and international law. Law and Politics Research, 11(26), 63-92. [In Persian]
32. Worcester, M., (2016). Water Security A Source of Future Conflicts? Berlin: Institut fur strategie- politik- sicherheits und wirtschaftsberatung.
33. Warner, J., (2004). Mind the gap-working with buzan: the Illisu Dam as a security issue. London: SOAS Water Issues Study Group, School of Oriental and African Studies/King’s College
34. Zaki, Y., Delshadzad, J., Karimi, B., (2014). Hydropolitical study and analysis of international rivers: with emphasis on Aras border river. Military and Security Geography Quarterly, 1(1), 37-65. [In Persian]
35. Zaki, Y., Najafi, S., (2020). Determining Iran hydropolitics strategies in Arvandrood basin. Human Geography Research. 52(4), 1529-1549. [In Persian] Doi: 10.22059/ 2020.296172.1008070. https:// transboundarywaters. science. oregonstate. edu