Cultural Components of Border Residents and its Role in Sustainable Security of Kermanshah Border Areas

Document Type : مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

Authors

• Nejat Mohammadifar ¹
• Ali Moradi ²

¹ Department of Political Sciences, University of Ardakan, Ardakan, Iran

² Department of Sociology, Eslam Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Eslam Abad-e-gharb. Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.2022.71770.1075

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the cultural components of the border residents and its role in sustainable security of Kermanshah border areas. According to the hypothesis, there is a significant relationship between the cultural components of the border residents and the sustainable security of the border areas. The present study was conducted by the method (quantitative and qualitative). The statistical population in the qualitative section included experts and specialists aware of the research topic. Snow ball method is the sampling method in the qualitative section, which reached a theoretical consensus with 30 elites and experts. A small part of the statistical population is included citizens of the border areas of Kermanshah province. According to initial estimates, the number of these people was 540. Semi-structured interviews and researcher-made questionnaires are used to collect data. The coding analysis method was used to identify and prioritize the cultural components and sustainable border security. Also, SPSS software was used in the quantitative part of the study. The results show that sustainable border security from the respondents' point of view has 19 semantic parts in six common categories, included "economic security", "social security", "political security", "environmental security", "military security" and "cultural security". On the other hand, the cultural dimensions of the border residents were the six dimensions of "participation and cooperation", "cultural cohesion", "two-way interaction", "insight and awareness", "ideology" and "chivalry". Correlation matrices between cultural categories and sustainable border security show that there is a significant and direct relationship between each of the components of this matrix. It can be said that the two categories of the core of sustainable border security and the six cultural components of border residents are interrelated; if a two-way interaction takes place between these components, social order will be formed in the borders and the border residents will witness a kind of sustainable security.

Keywords

• Culture
• Development
• Security
• Border Residents
• Kermanshah

References

1. Abbaszade, H., & karami, K., (2011). Social Capital and Sustainable National Security. Strategic Studies Quarterly. 14(51), 31-58. [In Persian].
2. Abbott, C., & Marsden, S., (2008). Tigers and Dragons: Sustainable Security in Asia and Australasia. London: Oxford Research Group.
3. Ahmadi Moghadam, I., (2010). Social security and identity. Societal Security Studies. 1(23), 133.163. [In Persian].
4. Amirzadeh, A., Amani, M., & khojasteh, M., (2018). Environmental Factors Role in security and Borders sustainable Development (The Case Study of Shirvan Border with Turkmenistan in Northern Khorasan). North Khorasan Research Police Science. 4(16), 61-76. [In Persian].
5. Ashoori, D., (1999). Political Encyclopedia. Tehran: Morvarid. [In Persian].
6. Atoofi, G.H., & Javidan Darogar, H., (2016).The importance and place of economic security in sustainable economic development. International Journal of Nations Research, 1(6), 14-23. [In Persian].
7. Babalian, M., & Radbin, A., (2014). Cultural security in Islamic society from the perspective of Nahj al-Balaghah. Islamic Social Research, 20 (101): 50-21. [In Persian].
8. Baggio, R., (2008). Symptoms of complexity in a tourism system, Tourism Analysis 13: 1-20.
9. Barnett, J., (1997). Environmental security: now what. In Seminar. Department of International Relations, Keele University.
10. Behmand, D., (2015). Investigating the role of ethnic groups in the direction of sustainable security (Case study: Kurdish ethnic group). 8th Congress of the Iranian Geopolitical Association, Empathy of Iranian ethnic groups, national cohesion and national authority, Sanandaj. [In Persian].
11. Belluck, D.A., Hull, R.N., Benjamin, S.L., Alcorn, J., & Linkov, I., (2007). Environmental Security, Critical Infrastructure and Risk Assessment. In Environmental Security in Harbors and Coastal Areas (pp. 3-17). Springer.
12. Boroumand, SH., (2008). Economic security in Iran and some selected countries (comparative study). Iran, Tehran: Economic Studies, Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly.
13. Buzan, B., (1997). Rethinking security after the Cold War. Cooperation and conflict, 32(1), 5-28.
14. Davies, A.R., (2020). Toward a sustainable food system for the European Union: insights from the social sciences. One Earth, 3(1), 27-31.
15. Eftekhari, A., (2005). Public safety conundrum, an introduction to the new position of the police in society. Collection of research papers on various aspects of public security and police, Tehran: University of Law Enforcement Sciences. [In Persian].
16. Emmers, R., (2007). Securitization. Contemporary security studies, 109-125.
17. Forrest, S. (2004). Indigenous identity as a strategy of cultural security. In Proceedings of the Third Northern Research Forum/Plenary on Security, Yellowknife, NWT September (Vol. 18).
18. Giddens, A., (1999). Modernization and individualization. (Nasser Movafeghian, Trans.).Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian].
19. Hashemi, S.M., Hekmatniya, H., & Esmaeilzadeh, A., (2019). Security Stable ranking border city using the cluster analysis (Case city of North Khorasan province). Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 9 (32), 163-180. [In Persian].
20. Hassan, O., (2015). Political security: from the 1990s to the Arab Spring.Contemporary Politics, 21(1), 86-99.
21. Hawkes, J., (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: Culture's essential role in public planning. Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd.
22. Inoguchi, T., (2003). Political security: Toward a broader conceptualization. International Studies, 40(2), 105-123.
23. Lotfi, M., (2011). The model of sustainable security in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Master Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Humanities. [In Persian].
24. Mandel, R., (2010). The changing face of national security. Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian].
25. McEldowney, J.F., (2005). Political security and democratic rights. Democratisation, 12(5), 766-782.
26. Moin, M., (1984). Persian Encyclopedia. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications, sixth edition. [In Persian].
27. Traore, D., (2017). The Role of Language and Culture in Sustainable Development. RISC Doctoral & Post Doctoral School Integrated and Coherent Sustainable Development, Aguascalientes, Mexico
28. Ullman, R. H. (1981). Redefining security. International security, 8(1), 129-153.
29. Zheng, X., Wang, R., Hoekstra, A. Y., Krol, M. S., Zhang, Y., Guo, K., & Wang, C. (2021). Consideration of culture is vital if we are to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. One Earth, 4(2), 307-319.