The Impact of Maritime Crime in the South China Sea on Regional Convergence

Document Type : مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

Authors

Rahmat Haji Mineh ¹

Sayed Mostafa Hashemi ²

Mahdi Rouzegir Ghale Noie ³

¹ Assistant Professor of International Relations, Department of Communication and Social Sciences, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

² Assistant Professor of Political Geography, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

³ M.A. in International Relations, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.2022.26927.0

Abstract

The waters of the South Sea of China are among the important international shipping lines and the artery of the world's sea routes.More than half of the world's trade and one-third of shipping is crossing the area. In recent years, the southern shore of the southern shore of China, especially the tin of Malacca and the Solo-Sulawesi Sea (the blue border of three Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines), has been very important for the economic and political development of the countries of the region due to its geographic and geo-economic status. However, maritime trade in this water zone has faced increasing challenges in the field of maritime security threats in recent years. The most important elements of maritime security in the region include piracy, maritime terrorism, human trafficking (one example of organized crime), illegal fishing and marine pollution caused by oil and gas fields at sea. In this area, maritime surveillance is also used as a tactic and source of income for groups associated with terrorist activities and extremism (the Abu Sayf terrorist group).... On the one hand, a significant part of the regional trade in ASEAN is carried out through this sea.
The research question is, what is the international and regional legal structure dealing with theft and maritime terrorism? In response to this question, it has been shown that regional states and trans-regional powers display different behaviors. The present study was conducted using descriptive and analytical methods.

Keywords

Maritime Security

Terrorism

Piracy

South China Sea

---

References

1. Abbaszadeh Fathabadi, M.,& Ramezani A. (2017). China's policy in the South Sea; The Politics of Power and Maritime Influence. World Politics Quarterly, 6 (2). 59-84[In Persian].
2. Abdullah Khani, A. (2004). Security Theories, An Introduction to the Planning of the National Security Doctrine. Iran, Tehran: Abrar Contemporary International Cultural Studies and Research Institute. [In Persian].
3. Almaududy A.A. (2016). Maritime Security challengesin Southeast Asia: Analaysis of International and regional Legal Frameworks. Australia, Wollongong, University of Wollongong.
4. Dadandish, P., & Koozehgar Kaleji, V. (2010). A Critical Study of Regional Security Complex Theory Using the Security Environment of the South Caucasus Region, Strategy Quarterly, No. 56.73-107. [In Persian].
5. Darmody, Stephen J. (1994). The Oil Pollution Act's Criminal Penalties: On a Collision Course with the Law of the Sea. Environmental Affairs Law Reviews, 21(89), 88-144.
6. Ghanbari Jahromi, M.J., & Shafiee Bafti, N. (2015). International Legal Dimensions of Combating Marine Oil Pollution and the Criminal Liability System. International Law Journal, 55(3), 53-80. [In Persian].
7. Hajimineh, R. (2013). Copenhagen School; Teachings and Concepts. World Studies Newsletter, Internal Journal of the Iranian Association for World Studies, 1(2), 29-49.[In Persian].
8. IRNA News Agency (2016). China has imposed sanctions on illegal fishermen in the South Sea, available at: https://www.irna.ir/news/82174132/ [In Persian].
9. Khezri, R. (2012). China's neighbors's policy in the South China Sea conflict. Bimonthly Events and Analyzes, January and February, No. 269. [In Persian].
10. Khezri, R. (2012). Sino-US strategy in the South China Sea. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 26 (3). [In Persian].
11. Kontrovich, E. (2004). The piracy Analogy: Modern Universal Jurisdiction’s Hollow Foundation. Harvard International Law Review, 45(1), 183-237.
12. Masroor, M., & Hassan Khani, M. (2018). Geopolitical rearrangement in the South China Sea, Geopolitical Quarterly, 14 (2). [In Persian].
13. Rosenberg, D. (2011). Governing the South China Sea: from freedom of the seas to ocean enclosure movements. Harvard Asia Quarterly, 13(4),120-154.
14. Saburi, Z., & Ghiyasi A. (2015). The Geopolitical Developments of the South China Sea and the Strategies of Regional and Transregional Actors: Implications and Consequences. Quarterly Journal of International Relations Research, 14. [In Persian].
15. Sharghi, A. (2015). Maritime Terrorism: Maritime Security and Government Responsibility, Political Science Quarterly, No. 31. [In Persian].
16. Taffer, A. (2013). China’s claims to Sovereignty over the Spartly archipelago. Harvard Asia Quarterly, 15(1),16-45.
17. Taqa, K. (2009). Piracy along with other maritime crimes, Gavah Quarterly, 14(1-2). [In Persian].
18. (2016). The global framework against maritime terrorism.
19. White House (2002). National strategy to combat weapons of mass destruction (WMD). December.
20. World Energy Outlook (2012). In-depth study on energy-efficiency (2011). International Energy Agency.
21. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (2006). Full text, related agreements, andratifications are available from the United Nations Web site at <www.un.org/Depts/los/index.htm>.
22. Bateman, S. (2006(. Ferry Safety: A Neglected Aspect of Maritime Security? Institute of Defenceand Strategic Studies Commentaries 31.
23. Chatterjee, N. (2010). Security Raised in Malacca Strait after Terror Warning. Reuters, March 4. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-malacca-threat-idUKTRE62335320100304
24. Fensom, A. (2017). $5 trillion Meltdown: What if China Shuts Down the South China Sea?. The National Interest. Retrieved https://nationalinterest.org/blog/5-trillion-meltdown-what-if-china-shuts-down-the-south-china-16996
25. Valencia, M.J. (2005). The Proliferation Security Initiative: Making Waves in Asia. USA, New York: University of Adelphi press.
26. ICC International Maritime Bureaue (2017). Piracy and Armed Rubbery against Ships, report for the period 1 Januaury-31 December.
27. Xu, B. (2014). South China Sea Tensions. athttp://www.cfr.org/china/south-china-sea-tensions/p29790
28. S. to Hunt Malacca Terrorists (2004). Channel News Asia, June 23.
29. John B. (2004). Countries Oppose U.S. Offer to Patrol. Malacca. Financial Times, April 5.
30. http://www.tradingeconomics.com
31. http://www.globalgisdata.com
32. http://www.southchinasea.org
33. http://www.eia.org
34. http://www.cfr.org/chinasea
35. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/release/2003/05/2003053/-3.html

https://www.chathamhouse.org/research/topics/south-china