Evaluation of Geopolitical Variables’ Impact on the Formation and Activity of Terrorist Groups (Case Study: Border Areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan)

Document Type : مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

Authors

• Aliakbar Dabiri ¹
• Mohammad Reza Hafeznia ¹
• Sayyid Yahya Safavi ²
• Mohammad Akhbari ³

¹ Tarbiat Modares University

² Imam Hossein University

³ Islamic Azad university

https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.v2i6.70658

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
The issue of terrorism in the third millennium has become one of the central issues of the world changes and the interconnection between powers and countries. One of the areas that is heavily affected by terrorism and its implications is South Asia, particularly the two countries, Afghanistan and Pakistan. In the past few decades, these two countries have always been under the influence of terrorism, and, in some cases, even released and transferred terrorism to other areas of the world. One of the most important dimensions of terrorism in this area is the geopolitical dimension of this phenomenon and the impact of geopolitical variables on the formation and activity of terrorist groups. Variables and geopolitical phenomena that are shaped by interaction of geography and power are among the crucial extraterritorial, transnational, and effective factors in the formation and activity of terrorist groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Certainly, the identification and analyses of these geopolitical variables will significantly help to understand the formation reasons and the activity of terrorist groups in these two countries. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to identify, evaluate and weigh the geopolitical variables that are effective in the formation and activity of terrorist groups in the border areas between Afghanistan and Pakistan.
2. Theoretical Framework
The temporal and spatial distribution of terrorist events on a global scale can have one of the following four patterns: random, heterogeneous, reinforcement and contagion. In fact, the attacks are either randomly distributed in space and time, or followed by the other three non-random patterns. The heterogeneous pattern implies that the experience of different countries about terrorism is disparate in space but is constant over time. Reinforcement also points out that terrorist incidents in a country will likely be intensified in the future in the same country. Contagion means that the occurrence of terrorist events in a country is likely to cause the occurrence of such events in the neighboring countries. It can be concluded that many countries experience a period of terrorist incidents that have not experienced before. Another point is that the contagion does not occur only through the geographical boundaries, but also in a non- contiguous manner. Non-contiguous contagion is a process that may involve collaboration of terrorist groups in such relationships as spying, training, budgeting, and supporting.
Because of having the resources, facilities, and appropriate information, terrorist groups that are supported by governments are often able to carry out more deadly attacks than other terrorists. Therefore, the terrorist operations of tyrannical governments are more responsible than individual terrorism operations for the victims and miseries. Secret brutality of state terrorists will have a low cost for the supporting government, and if it is used properly and secretly against strong enemies, it can prevent international punishment or retaliation.
From the geopolitical viewpoint, the world is in the midst of great chaos. On the one hand, multilateral regional unions have been developed (such as the European Union, NAFTA, Mercosur, APEC, etc.), and, on the other hand, a renaissance of nationalism, the emergence of fundamentalism, pro-independence movements and the autonomy of a minority are appeared. Most of conflicts are internal in that a part of the population opposes the central authority. Today, after the collapse of the bipolar system and the challenge of the US unipolar order by other rival powers, the world is in a long-term transitional period that has not yet reached a new and consistent order. Hence, there is a kind of disorder, mismanagement and lack of integrated control over global changes and the formation and activity of terrorist groups is one of its indicators.
3. Methodology
This research is a descriptive-analytic study that intends to identify geopolitical variables that affect the formation and activity of terrorist groups. In terms of collecting information, a library method and a questionnaire were used. SPSS software was used to validate and weigh the variables.
4. Findings and Discussion
By investigating library documents and field findings show that eight geopolitical variables including " locating among critical states and regions," " foreign supports from institutions which promote fundamentalism ", " long, penetrable and far from the center geographic borders "," geographic affinity among ethnic-religious groups in two sides of the borders "," geopolitical rivalry between powers ", " lack of regional or global hegemonic power ", "buffer situation ", " border and territorial conflicts with neighboring states" as well as 21 categories related to these variables are impact in formation and the activities of terrorist groups in the border areas between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Also, descriptive and inferential statistics (T-test) indicate that the average score of all eight geopolitical variables is significantly higher than the standard mean (x=3). Therefore, the effectiveness of these geopolitical variables in the formation and activity of terrorist groups in the border areas between Afghanistan and Pakistan is also confirmed by experts.

Keywords

• Terrorism
• Terrorist groups
• Geopolitical variable
• Border areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan

References

1. Abdullah Khani, A. (2009). International Security Code 4, Special for Al Qaeda, International Studies and Research Institute Abrar Moaser Theran. (In Persian).

2. Ataei, F. & Shahvand, Sh. (2012). Sectarian Extremism in Pakistan (1979-2001), Political Science Quarterly, 8(2). 83-106. (In Persian).

3. Brynjar, L. (2004). Causes of Terrorism: an Expanded and updated review of the Literature, Forsvarets Forsknings Institutt (FFI) Norwegian Defence Research Establishment.

4. Crenshaw, M. (2005). Political Explanations, the International Summit on Democracy, Terrorism and Security, Addressing the Causes of Terrorism, the Club De Madrid Series on Democracy and Terrorism, Madrid.

5. Dehghanian, M.H. & Seyyed Zadeh, J. (2010). Book of Asia 5 Special Issues of Pakistan, Paper of Crisis Factors in Pakistan's Political System, International Studies and Research Institute, Abrar Moaser Theran. (In Persian).

6. Dehsyar, H. & Mahmoudi, Z. (2010). Pakistan's Attitudes to the Fight against Terrorism (2001-2008), Foreign Relations Quarterly, 2(5). 83-108. (In Persian).

7. Etaat, J. & Dabiri, A.A. (2016). Terroeism, Spatial Diemenation and Global Perspectives, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press, (In Persian).

8. Ganor, B. (2002). Defining Terrorism: Is One Man’s Terrorist another Man’s Freedom Fighter? Police Practice and Research, 3(4), 287- 304.

9. Gilani, S.Z. (2008). Swimming against the tide Towards Peace among the Pashtun People. The newsletter of Pashtun peace forum Canada, 1(1), 1-3.

10. Giustozzi, A. (2007). Koran, Kalashnikov and Laptop: The Neo-Taliban Insurgency in Afghanistan. London: HURST Publishers Ltd.

11. Global Peace Index (2015). Measuring Peace, it’s Causes and its Economic Value, the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP).

12. Global Terrorism Database, Afghanistan (2017). https:// www.start.umd.edu/ gtd/ search/ Results. aspx? chart=overtime&search=afghanistan

13. Global Terrorism Database, Pakistan (2017). https:// www.start.umd.edu /gtd/ search/ Results. aspx? search=pakistan&sa.x=0&sa.y=0

14. Global Terrorism Index (2017). Measuring and understanding the impact of terrorism, the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP).

15. Hafeznia, M.R. (2006). Principles and Concepts of Geopolitics, Mashhad: Papoli Publications, (In Persian).

16. Hilali A.Z. (2005). US-Pakistan Relationship: Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan. Aldershot Ashgate.

17. Hoffman, B. (1998). Inside Terrorism, New York: Columbia University Press.

18. http://www.nctc.gov/site/groups/afghan_taliban.html.

19. Koolaee, E. (1998). Politics and Government in Central Asia, Tehran: SAMT Publications, (In Persian).

20. Lizardo, O. A. & Bergesen, A. (2003). Types of Terrorism by World System Location, humboldt journal of social relations, 27(2). 162-192.

21. Masoudnia, H. & Najafi, D. (2011). Factors Influencing the Formation and Growth of Fundamentalism in Pakistan, Quarterly Journal of Subcontinent Researches. 3(8). 83-116 (In Persian).

22. Midlarsky, Manus I., Crenshaw, M. & Fumihiko Y. (1980). Why Violence Spreads: The Contagion of International Terrorism. International Studies Quarterly24. 2682-298.

23. Mohammadi, A. (2010). Asia Book 5 Special Issues in Pakistan, Extremism in Pakistan: Facts and Strategies, International Studies and Research Institute, Abrar Moaser Theran. (In Persian).

24. Mosalenezhad, A. (2009). Social culture and Geopolitical of Power in Afghanistan, Geopolitical Quarterly. 5(1). 168-197. (In Persian).

25. Najaf zadeh, M. (2004). Asia Books (3), Special Post-Taliban Afghanistan, Functioning of US, Pakistan, and Russia intelligence agencies in the Afghanistan crisis, International Studies and Research Institute, Abrar Moaser Theran. (In Persian).

26. Nasr, V.R. (2004). Islamization, the State and Development, in Islamization and the Pakistan Economy, Robert M. Hathaway and Wilson Lee (eds), Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

27. Ramonet, I. (1998). Geopolitical of Chaos, Translated from French by Andrea Lyn Secara, Algora Publishing.

28. Rashid, A. (2001), Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil, and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

29. Rashid, A. (2008). Descent into Chaos: How the War against Islamic Extremism is Being Lost in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia. London: Penguin Group.

30. Rawa, O. (2000). Afghanistan from Jihad to Civil Wars, translation Ali Alami, Tehran: Publishing of Institute for Political and International Studies. (In Persian).

31. Richardson, L. (2005). State-Sponsorship: A Root Cause of Terrorism, in Tore Bjorgo, Root Causes of Terrorism: Myths, Reality and Ways Forward, New York: Routledge.

32. Richardson, L. (2007). What Terrorists Want, New York: Random House.

33. Roashan, R. (2005). End of Imaginary-Durand Line. http://www. worldaffairsboard.com/ war-terrorism (accessed November 20, 2009).

34. Shafiei, I. & Aidouzai, N. (2013). The role of foreign support in the revival of the Taliban in Afghanistan, Quarterly Journal of Subcontinent Research. 5(16). 91-126. (In Persian).

35. Shafiei, N. (2004). Asia Book (3), Special Post-Taliban Afghanistan, article on the main challenges of the Karzai government, fears and hopes of the constitution, International Studies and Research Institute, Abrar Moaser Theran. (In Persian).

36. Shafiei, N. (2005). Pakistan's Role in the Growth of Islamists, Diplomatic Hamshahri, No. 61. 61-65. (In Persian).

37. Thier, J.A. (2009). The Future of Afganistan, United States Institute of Peace.

38. Weimann, G. & Brosius, H.B. (1988). The Predictability of International Terrorism: A Time-Series Analysis, Journal of Terrorism. 491-502. 11 (6).

39. Yamin, S. & Malik, S. (2014). Mapping Conflict Trends in Pakistan, United States.

40. Zeb, R. (2006). Cross Border Terrorism Issues Plaguing Pakistan Afghanistan Relation, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. 69-74. 4(2).