Pattern of human structures relationships and cultural realms in West Asia with emphasis on Iranian cultural realm

Document Type : مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

Authors

• Mohammad Reza Hafeznia
• Ebrahim Rumina
• Ghaderi Hajat Mostafa

Trbiat Modares

https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.v1i2.52918

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1.Introduction
Relationship pattern has a complex, combinational and also intelligible nature in the current geopolitical structure of the world. Civilizations’ relations together and Civilization interactions include: engagement, competition and conflict in a range of geopolitical treatment pattern. Some of spatial values which originated challenges among region country have Civilization nature. Iranian’s Civilization have located near various Civilizations’ which this vicinity leads forming a pattern of relations which contain friendly to inimically relations in a wide range during thousands of years. This Civilization has formed during history and has cached politicians’ opinion in the political process. Regional claiming actors try to extend their penetrations by magnifying their Civilization elements
2.Theoretical Framework
Geopolitical relations are these which are based on combination of elements such as politics, power and geography between countries, stats and political actors.
Geopolitical relations between regional and trans-regional can be seen in the following forms:
Interaction relation. Consist of different and interactional relations between actors based on common goals and interests.
Domination relation. Caused by inequality of power between actors of stronger actors impose their own wills on weaker actors.
Influence relation. Influence is a kind of reflexive of domination and result of inequality of power.
Competitive relation. This relation forms based on relative equality of power of actors.
Confrontational relation. This relation forms frequently based on equality of power between actors when Conflicting interests between actors have special importance so that competition between them goes out of standard limit and leads to conflict.
3. Methodology
This article tries to analyses human structures and cultural realms in West Asia and political relation of this regions whit Iran’s Civilization structure, using an analytical-discerbtive method and reeling on library recourses.
4. Findings and Discussion
Research result show that Iran’s Civilization has a special today which contains geostrategic situation and its enormous recourses; but we should note is that this Civilization has encountered many challenges and these challenges predispose its debilitation. All Civilization loops around Iran have special strategic depth and Iran is only country where has relied itself without any support in this full competition world. Sami Civilization in the south support Persian Gulf Cooperation Council and Arab union, Torani Civilization headed by Turkey, supports by Europe union and the United States and also Slavic Civilization based on Russia’s efficient power is in a better situation than Iran.

Keywords

• southwest Asia
• geopolitical region
• Sami Civilization
• Iranian Civilization Torani Civilization
• Slavic Civilization

References

Abi-Saab, G. (1995). The concept of international organization, (I .Pad, Trans.).Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company.

Amini, M. R. (2014). Political twist in relations between India and Iran, Jam Online News ID: 14163397155888723.

Barzegar, K. (2004). Iran and Saudi political relations after the September eleventh, Rahbord Journal, 27, 195-231.

Boyd,A. (2002). An Atlas of world affairs (H. Hmidinia, Trans.).Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Publications Center.

Cohen, S. B. (1994). Geopolitics in the New World Era, Chapter 2 from Reordering the World, (Ed.). USA: Westview Press.

Dahlberg, K. A. (1970). Regional integration: the neo-functional versus a Configurative approach. International Organization. 24(1), 122-128.

Dougherty, J. E., & Faltzgraff, R. L. (2006). Competing Theories of International Relations. (A. R. Tayeb,Trans.).Tehran: Ghomes.

Gehring, T. (1996). Integrating integration theory neo-functionalism and international regime. Global Society. 10(3).

Gholami, F. (2007, October 17). Relations between Iran and Russia Throughout history, News Analysis website Asr-e Iran, Published: 11:53.

Hafeznia, M. R. (2007). Principles and concepts of geopolitics, Mashhad: Amir kabir publication.

Hashemabadi, A. (1979). Relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia in the last decade (1979 & 1989). (Unpublished MA dissertation). Imam Sadegh University, Tehran, MA.

Haviland, W., Harald, E.L., MacBride, B., & Walrath, D. (2013). Cultural Anthropology: The Human Challenge. Cengage Learning. Retrieved, from http: // gocengage. Com / infotrac.

Hefeznia, M. R., & kaviani Rad, M. (2005). The new approaches in political geography, Tehran: Samt Pablication.

Hettne, B. (2000). The new regionalism and the future of Security and development. London: Macmillan Press.

Hossein Pour, R. (2012). Explain the pattern of relations in the geopolitical regions, case study Indian subcontinent. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Phd.

Khadem, F. (2010) .Game reflection Saudi Arabia and the United States on Iran's national security, Middle East Studies Quarterly, 100-101.

Khomeini,R. (2000). Sahife noor, Retrieved, from: http://www.jamaran.ir.

Khomeini,R. (2000). Sahife noor, vol. 21, Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini works, Third Edition, 77.

Mujtahidzade, P. (2000). Islands of Tunb and Abu Musa. Faculty of Law and Political Sciences of Tehran University, 46.

Naderian, H. (2012). Reviews the roots of the dispute between Iran and Saudi Arabia in the regional and international levels; Retrieved, from http:// www. siasi. porsemani.ir/ content

Nel, Ph., & Jordaan, E. (1999).Power, wealth and global order. South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.

Roumina, E. (2015). Geopolitical regions of Southwest Asia based on civilization variable. Geopolitics. 10(4).

Shojaei, M. (2008). Regional rivalry Iran and Saudi Arabia and balance of powers in the Middle East, Political & Economic Information, 239 - 240, 41.

Short, J.R. (2004). An introduction to political geography. London: Routledge.

Taylor J. P. & Flint C. (2000). Political geography. World-economy, nation-state and locality. (4th Ed.). Prentice Hall: Harlow.

Wolf, P. (1973). International organization and attitude change: a re-examination of the functionalist approach, International Organization. 27(4).